I have a point of clarification. The board of directors had 15 members. A group of members—I'll call them a member council, but that's not their official title—was put in place to name half of the board, but also to do things like name the external auditors. It was that group of members that dwindled down to two, and this is where I believe the board of directors of the foundation failed in ensuring that the foundation would continue to comply with its enabling legislation, which required not only the board to have 15 members, but the member council to have 15 members.
On June 13th, 2024. See this statement in context.