Thank you very much.
There's just a point of clarification from the analyst.
For recommendation 6.29, which I'll note was one of the two priority recommendations as referenced by the auditor earlier, SDTC partially disagreed with the recommendation to reassess projects approved. They stated that “written records did not fully capture the robust deliberations made”.
Today, ISED, through you, Deputy, stated that it would proceed to review.
Does ISED, therefore, agree with the recommendations made to SDTC by the Auditor General? You seemed to imply that you supported it, whereas SDTC did not.
Could you just clarify that, please?