As I mentioned before, we don't look at the individual actions of a person. We went to the organization, but I believe the honourable member is talking about a reference in paragraph 6.42, where we did highlight that there was an external expert who had a conflict and wasn't removed. Again, this is an instance where the conflict of interest policy didn't cover things or wasn't followed, so I believe that we highlighted a couple of those situations in paragraph 6.42.
I can ask Mathieu to add to that, if you would like more details.