Okay. I appreciate that.
This is for the Auditor General. There's a fellow named Chris Wormald. He was the business review analyst for this outside consultant, and he put forward reports—we have copies of them—that said a number of these projects should not be approved and shouldn't be qualified under the fund. Then, within only a couple of months, he put forward a report saying, “Oh, sorry, I changed my mind; these should be approved.” It so happens that the ones he changed his mind on were all financially owned by one of the directors.
Did you, as the Auditor General, as part of the governance analysis, understand and look in depth at this fellow, Chris Wormald, and all of those things that were off the table and rejected and then mysteriously back on the table and that happened to be ones the directors owned?