Thank you, Chair.
Commissioner, you just confirmed that you are further investigating Randy Boissonnault in relation to the infamous other Randy affair. A partner at Randy Boissonnault's company sent many text messages claiming to be in communication with Randy Boissonnault and receiving direction from Randy about the work of the company. If he was given that direction, then that would clearly be a violation of the law. By his own admission, the partner lied by claiming that there was another Randy at the company. He also absurdly claimed that in every case Randy was mentioned, it was autocorrect.
You told us that your previous investigation looked at September 8. Now you're looking at other dates. I certainly welcome the further investigation you're doing in this regard.
I want to clarify something from Mr. Brock's testimony. It sounds like, in seeking information from Mr. Boissonnault and in seeking text messages across all apps and all possible phones, you're essentially using the honour system and that you're expecting honourable members to be honourable in handing over all of the information you've requested and not hiding anything. Is that correct? Is that the way you operate?