That's not quite correct. I am only asked to look at people who fall under my act. Those are the people who have been appointed by order in council. There are lots of members on the board of SDTC who are not appointed by order in council, and their conflict is not part of my remit.
I find it shocking to see what the Auditor General has reported in terms of conflict of interest, etc., but it was not conflict of interest by reporting public office holders, and that's all I can look at: conflict of interest by reporting public office holders.
In this case, I was asked specifically to look at two reporting public office holders, and I looked at them, at their activities.