Yes, and just to briefly motivate, I think that's consistent with the consensus we want to establish, which is to say, as Mr. Desjarlais said, that we're not leaving a massive, unlimited, open-ended bucket of witnesses. We are defining witnesses in the motion, but on the basis of what different parties see as being important.
Mr. Perkins already gave some specific reasoning around Mr. Guilbeault, and I think all parties will likely have questions they want to ask him. Let's keep the RCMP commissioner. Sure, let's keep the Auditor General. I think we'll have a chance to add the law clerk later, but let's also leave in Mr. Guilbeault.
Thanks.