Thank you very much. I just wanted to clarify that for the record.
Now, I know that we've had a lot of conversations today about what it means to have conflict of interest in our public institutions within the roles that people of influence hold in terms of how they conduct business and with regard to that public perception of what our democracy is and what the value of those public institutions is. As the same token as we've heard of Ms. Verschuren.... For example, the Leader of the Opposition, when he invested in Bitcoin and then used his position for it to become a more powerful currency or of greater value.... It's something that sounds like a conflict of interest or, at the very least, an attempt to influence the market for his own personal gain.
Now, using that as an example and using the case before us with SDTC as an example, do you think that the conflict of interest rules are too tight, or are they too broad? Do we need to go into what it means, what a conflict of interest is in this day and age?