I would simply say that, if you aren't prepared to call that a failure, I don't know what could be a failure, because it's a top-to-bottom failure. It's a systematic failure, but ultimately, it was the minister who made the decision.
Going back to the letter of recommendation from the PCO, once that letter with recommended candidates, for the chair of SDTC in this case—and you're going to come back with the number on that letter—is sent, it is up to the minister and the minister's team to then vet those recommended candidates.
Is that correct?