Evidence of meeting #139 for Public Accounts in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was sdtc.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

1  As an Individual

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Thank you, Chair.

Fellow whistle-blowers stated in an interview on November 1, 2023, when the independent review had yet to start, that your group remained “unconvinced that the human resources investigation will have the necessary autonomy and authority to get to the bottom of things.”

Not only was the independent review led by a third party law firm, but it was also publicly announced that all former SDTC employees would not be bound by NDAs so they may speak freely about issues related to their employment at SDTC.

Can you elaborate on why this was your view?

6:15 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

Can you explain the question again? I missed it.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Okay, yes.

I'm sorry about the noise. Can everyone please keep it down? The witness is not able to hear the question.

I'm sorry about that, Mr. Witness. I'll start again.

Fellow whistle-blowers stated in an interview on November 1, 2023, when the independent review had yet to start, that your group remained “unconvinced that the human resources investigation will have the necessary autonomy and authority to get to the bottom of things.”

Not only was the independent review led by a third party law firm, but it was also publicly announced that all former SDTC employees would not be bound by NDAs so they may speak freely about issues related to their employment at SDTC.

Can you elaborate on why this was your view?

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

RCGT was also hired by ISED, and that was a clear disaster, so why would we expect McCarthy Tétrault to do anything differently?

I can't speak for the whistle-blower you're talking about in that specific article because, again, it's not a single person, but I would again mention that if you truly believe that this statement you're mentioning and this defensive action are true, please release everyone from their NDAs so they can all speak about this. If you are actually truly interested in the abuses that happened, talk to your minister and ask him to release everyone from the NDAs. He has the ability to do that, because he has now appointed board members who are all from the federal government. He can, in one fell swoop, release everyone from the NDAs. We can listen to everyone's testimony and we can look at every single thing that McCarthy Tétrault says is true or not true.

I don't find this back-and-forth productive because, again, how am I supposed to stand up and provide examples when doing that might implicate someone in the NDAs that they have? I think it's a bad line of questioning that you keep focusing on. If you truly cared about the situation, you would maybe get the NDAs off everyone instead of talking about how great of a job McCarthy Tétrault did.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

With all due respect, you're here to answer our questions.

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

I think I did answer the question.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

I'd like to go back to your opening statement. You mentioned how you feel that “real accountability [still] doesn't exist.”

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

That's correct.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Would you like to elaborate on why you still, at this current time, feel that it's not—

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

Why doesn't the government release all the documents to the RCMP? Again, if they don't think there's a problem, they should release the documents to the RCMP. I'm not asking for the public.

Again, there's all of this lack of publicity. The minister didn't release the RCGT report to the public, and he wasn't even willing to release it to the committee. I think it's embarrassing that.... When we're talking about the ethics committee and what happened there, I personally got involved with politicians from all sides and gave them the report, because I had the RCGT report before the members of Parliament did. When you have to go to those extremes, I think it's embarrassing.

Again, on this question around why I don't trust the government, it's like, does anyone trust the government?

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

As SDTC programming is fully transitioning to the National Research Council, what are your recommendations to the government at this point in time?

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

Fire the useless executives and senior management who have been implicated.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

Thank you very much. There'll be another chance to continue that.

We're beginning our fourth and final round, in which there'll be six slots of various times for six members.

Mr. Stewart, you have the floor for five minutes, please.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Thank you for being here today.

To the whistle-blower through the chair, one thing I'd like to ask for is the production of documents for the unredacted interim RCGT report and the unredacted final RCGT report. Is that something that we can get here?

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Is that a motion?

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

It's through the witness.

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

I think that's for the witness. If the witness is able to table the reports—

6:20 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

I don't have the unredacted reports. I have one that's partially less redacted than what was given to the committee, so I can provide that.

The only thing I can provide for that interim report is the audio recordings and the transcript, which is verbatim the partner at—

6:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

We appreciate that.

There was another thing as well, before I get into this.

In addition to the recordings, there's still an interest here in getting copies of the historical contribution agreements, as well as.... I understand there are some policy changes and there's an updated contribution agreement. Are you able to provide both of those agreements as well?

6:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

I think so. I don't know if I have the ratified one for the most updated, but I can provide contribution agreements six, seven, eight and nine, which are the ones that would be relevant to the time period we're talking about.

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Can the committee get the most recent ones within the production of documents?

6:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

I think you'd have to ask ISED or SDTC to provide the most recent one.

6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Okay.

Was anybody in the bureaucracy fired after everything that's been discussed here?

6:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Witness 1

I think there have been a lot of convenient retirements.

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

That's an interesting way of putting it.

I heard my colleague from South Shore—St. Margarets call it a culture of corruption. It's actually next-level corruption with adrenaline shots and then steroids to follow that. This is the worst scandal I've seen in my time here.

One of the questions I have is about the contribution agreements. I was a provincial minister—and I know this is different—but if we wanted to spend outside the threshold, we would have to go to the executive council and then we could maybe spend more if that was something the government was going to do.

Doesn't Parliament have to approve spending outside of what the contribution agreements lay out?