There will be better data as we move forward. In addition, we were facing or expecting a much higher level of volume, and indeed we had that. We had 10,000 projects, whereas other agencies were dealing with much smaller volumes.
We took an approach—I think we wouldn't do it the same way again—of having a very streamlined application process. That was not just to reduce the administrative burden on us—because we were expecting a wave, which we got—but also to reduce the burden on applicants. We went very narrow at the beginning of this program in terms of what we collected. We went too narrow; even we would say too narrow.
The other thing was that no one expected this to go on for two years. It's easy in hindsight, but we were all thinking that this was a three-month program. We needed to get it out quickly. We were going to get a wave of applications. We would have time to gather more data afterwards.
Our whole philosophy, when we funded this, was to be very lean and to help absolutely everyone. Our basic philosophy was that we were not going to ration the program. Anyone who—