I understand. At the same time, it's interesting to see how they were able to meet the spirit of their own mission.
I would like to ask you another question about the agencies.
In your opinion, did the agencies take a risk by providing funding to businesses that weren't financially viable? In some cases, certain companies apparently even used the funding to repay shareholder loans, provide financial support to family members or purchase a vehicle. I'm referring to paragraphs 14.50 and 14.51 in your report.
Do you think the agencies might have taken risks that were a bit too high?