Again, there were conflicts of interest, money improperly going out the door and reliance, supposedly in good faith, on counsel who was in a blatant conflict of interest and in blatant contravention of the SDTC act. It's just unbelievable that you can come here with a straight face and defend the practices of SDTC and its board in the face of that.
Mr. Kukucha, speaking of law-breaking at SDTC, which you were complicit in, Mr. Vandenberg was part of a two-member council that, under the act, is required to have 15 members and requires five members to achieve quorum, yet this two-person council appointed five directors to the SDTC board. They were all unlawful appointments.
How do you explain that?