Thank you. Then to start off the meeting, every director knew which investments on the agenda each board member who was conflicted had an investment in, which is what you just confirmed.
The Auditor General went over 226 board-approved transactions from over a five-year period, which was a sample of the more than 400 during that period of time, and found that 186 of those were conflicted. In other words, 82% of all transactions that were coming before the board were conflicted with board members or board members had an interest. Is that correct? Were you, the board members, recusing yourselves or abstaining 82% of the time?