I agree with that, and I fully commend the work related to the rebuilding of the program.
What's important to understand in any mistake, particularly system failures like this—I classify this as a massive system failure—is that in your work to try to rebuild it, you need to understand how these things went wrong. The Auditor General found instances where high-level officials were taken out to dinners and gave preferential treatment to GC Strategies.
Do you think that, in any way, shape or form, could have determined the outcome of GC Strategies getting onto a list like TBIPS, which allowed them access to millions of dollars in government contracts?