Right, but just to emphasize here, the Auditor General and the procurement ombud's work focused on some of the significant failures of the process. They're not geared towards identifying individual culpability for things that have happened.
The internal investigation appears very much to be investigating people with the view to holding people accountable, yet that internal investigation is caught up in a factional conflict, which implicates the highest levels of CBSA. You have a minister saying he wants a head on a platter and you have officials that are going back and forth over whose head it should be.
In that case, insofar as there's a need to identify who was responsible for certain decisions, shouldn't that investigation happen external to the CBSA, not inside of the CBSA?