As I said in my previous comments, I think it's important that we receive the evidence the whistle-blower alluded to in his letter. We've agreed to extend our study on SDTC. If there's any evidence that the whistle-blower did not provide us during his testimony last week, I think we should request it.
In addition, I asked the whistle-blower for evidence to back up claims that the minister was manipulating the McKinsey report, and the whistle-blower refused. Given that the whistle-blower has now volunteered to provide this type of evidence and more, I think it would benefit our committee to request this.
I think it's a fairly straightforward motion, and I would appreciate everyone's support on this.