Maybe just to help you answer, the Auditor General went through 226 of 420 projects. Of the 226 projects reviewed by the Auditor General, the Auditor General identified 186 conflicts of interest. Based upon the sample that the Auditor General took, in which the Auditor General found that 82% of projects involved conflicts of interest, when you look at the balance of the projects, there could be somewhere in the neighbourhood of anywhere from 180 to 200 additional conflicts of interest that involved former green slush fund board members. Those are a lot of conflicts. That's a lot of wrongdoing to examine.
I am wondering exactly what is being done and what assurance you can provide that those conflicts and that wrongdoing are being captured? Count me skeptical if you're telling me that some third party consultants are coming in and are doing that work in a sufficient way.