As a matter of order, where are we procedurally?
Mr. Desjarlais has sought unanimous consent on something. Fundamentally, it seems like there isn't unanimous consent. Can we see if there's unanimous consent? If there's not unanimous consent, then we're debating the motion.
I suspect that the Liberals are trying to use this moment of procedural ambiguity to simply delay. If they want to filibuster, they can filibuster, but they have to do the hard work of filibustering. They're either agreeing to this UC motion or they have to do the hard work of filibustering. It's got to be one or the other, and I think that's how we should proceed.