I was just responding to the point of order from Mr. Erskine-Smith.
I hope this is helpful. I'm not trying to start a needless conflict. It's just that we're all guided by rules, and those rules are well established.
When there's a question of privilege—much as is happening in the House right now—that supersedes other business. If the chair rules that it is a matter touching on privilege, then that supersedes the other matters.
To Mr. Erskine-Smith's point, it's not as if someone just moved a motion on another topic. It has unique status as a privilege motion.
Again, I hope that's helpful.