Thank you very much.
If Mr. Perkins has contributions to make to this very valuable debate, I'm sure he can raise his hand and get on the list that you're keeping, Chair.
The point that I was making, first, is that this motion is for nefarious purposes—jamming up this committee, jamming up the House of Commons.
Second, it is procedurally incorrect, I would say, because there are so many other options and other ways for this committee to be able to get to whatever answers it is looking for through written requests or through inviting the minister back again or through many other ways.
I'm not sure why Mr. Perkins is shrieking at me. I do like that word “shrieking”. It's a nice word.