Yes. Proper corporate behaviour would have been to take it out of the consent agenda. If a member comes forth and says that they have a conflict with company X, then you take company X out of the consent agenda and deal with the consent agenda minus company X. Then deal with company X, and she has to recuse herself and leave the room. That would have been the proper way.
Here, they follow this rather strange procedure in which she says she has a conflict. It's noted. On consent agenda item one, is everybody agreed? Everyone says yes, including her, and it's done.
This doesn't make sense. If you abstain, which you can't—the act has no provision for it.... Anyway, obviously if you indicate your conflict, then you shouldn't be involved. You should actually leave the room. That wasn't followed. That's what this sentence that you cite is trying to drive at.