Nathaniel Erskine-Smith at the Public Accounts Committee

I understand that, but let's deal with the charter question as well.

You're a lawyer. In what world could this evidence be admissible, given that it was not subject to a search warrant on reasonable grounds?

My former colleagues at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association are going to point and laugh at this. In what world could this ever be used? It's a clear violation of one's charter rights.