That's understood—absolute and unfettered.
However, with “absolute and unfettered”, we ourselves should possibly subject ourselves to some reasonable framework that we should operate under, because you could imagine a request for documents in any number of instances. You could imagine a number of unreasonable requests, including this one, in which documentary disclosure is being demanded in the face of the Auditor General's concerns, the RCMP's concerns and lawyers' concerns that this is improper. In the face of former parliamentary counsel saying that this is an abuse of power, we still have that power. If we're willing to use it in this case, when are we not willing to use it?
Thanks very much.