Let's look at the jurisdiction for which you're responsible, conflicts of interest.
The Auditor General identifies those 90 cases. I want to go into the details a little bit here, because you have 63 cases that have to do with two votes around bundled COVID payments.
It's relatively straightforward what happened here. You've articulated this, and just so I have this clear, a lawyer at Osler who was reporting counsel gave advice to the board to say that they had already declared these conflicts or they'd managed these conflicts, so they didn't have to redeclare them and they could vote as a bundled payment without further declaring conflicts on this matter.
That was bad advice, obviously. You've said it was incorrect legal advice. You are right and the Auditor General is right, but that's what happened. It was bad legal advice that they were following.