Mr. Chair, I appreciate the member's question and the desire to see rapid action in this set of circumstances.
I would reiterate what was said when we appeared previously. We talked about the construct of this foundation and that they were “good behaviour” appointments. You have to prove cause; that's set out in the legislation, and that can be a very challenging thing to do. You need a lot of facts and evidence. Quite frankly, that was part of the reason why fact-finding was being undertaken, to make sure that we had all of the information.
To the member's question about additional investigations, our expectation was that we would get to the facts through the RCGT report and we would then take whatever action was necessary at that time. Ultimately, that's what our colleagues did. They put forward advice. We saw that there was a change in the structure and that the individuals who had been part of the board resigned.
I take the member's point, but I think that, at the end of the day, there was resolution, and quick resolution, as far as I'm concerned. I have seen reports take much longer than this. I think we all did our best to move as quickly as possible in the circumstances.