I would say that it is pretty standard that we wouldn't have emails back and forth with the minister's office or the Prime Minister's Office. The deliberations of the selection committee, as I mentioned, are held in the advice letters, and we provided that. It would not be standard for us to be privy to any kinds of conversations that would happen at the political level in relation to an appointment, so we would not have emails from the Prime Minister's Office or the minister's office, or be privy to any of those discussions.
I feel that we have done our utmost to provide as much information as possible to support the committee in its study, while doing our best to respect the individual's privacy and the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act.