I understand that, but I do think we should treat them differently. I think it would be useful for this to make sure that it's absolutely clear there's nothing hidden here. I think it's very important that.... I have no interest in information related to anyone else. I do not care.
My colleagues are right. We are Parliament. If there's any personal information related to Ms. Verschuren that you are concerned about and we're redacting because of the Access to Information Act, that is improper. Whether we hold this in camera or we determine amongst ourselves whether it should be public, we can, as a committee, discuss this. However, I think you should separate these and you should come back to the committee and say, “These particular instances have nothing to do with Ms. Verschuren, and these other instances do.”
My last question, then, relates to the letter that was held back, based on the confidence of the Privy Council. What's the rationale for that? How can that be justified, given the parliamentary request?