No. Okay.
We hear this fund falsely being called a “green slush fund”, that is, money set aside in a pot to sit there and not be used, which we know is false, as over $3 billion in revenue was generated from companies that received SDTC funding.
Can you speak to some of these funding decisions, how the board decided to provide funding over the long term and the recusal process that was needed each time a project came in front of the board for a funding proposal?