This is money we are supposed to have, but it hasn't been received yet. I'm not sure how the average person is going to perceive this. I don't know if they would call it a recovery of funds. Rather, it would be a budget cut because the expected objectives weren't achieved or because there would have been abuse in this matter.
I'd like to come back to the recommendation you made to the foundation, which was to review the eligibility criteria. As part of your audit, you established samples on the recovery of funds. That's why you recommended reviewing all possible contracts signed with the companies, because it was suspected that if a certain number of recoveries had taken place, there would most likely be others.
Did the foundation accept that recommendation, at least partially? I know that other witnesses subsequently said they agreed with the recommendation and that they were in the process of conducting this review.