With most of those documents, as I understand it, over 10,000 pages have been redacted, not complying with the order, and ISED is still going through the documents. They've done a couple of rounds, and they have others.
As I understand it from reading the law clerk's letters, the order came from the Privy Council Office to say to filter the responses through the Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act, which were not part of the House's order. That's why we're at the stalemate right now where the government could produce the documents unredacted. The House's order didn't say redact them or filter them through these acts. They could provide it and we could get on from the stalemate.
Your office was a recipient of that direction from the Privy Council Office. Could you tell me who in the Privy Council Office wrote that letter?