The Ethics Commissioner found that I took what I believed at the time to be proper steps and that I believed at the time that I had acted within the bounds of the act. I really did.
There were two things that he talked about. He said that I was somewhat led astray in terms of the lack of consistency in the decision-making process at SDTC. I really declared conflicts. One of the things that I should have done better was, instead of abstaining, I should have recused myself, but that was the process that was established and what I followed at SDTC. I accept the Ethics Commissioner's findings.
He also found that there was no evidence that I attempted to influence the decisions of my colleagues on the SDTC board.