Evidence of meeting #152 for Public Accounts in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was sdtc.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Annette Verschuren  As an Individual
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Hilary Smyth

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Ms. Verschuren, with the greatest respect, that was not my question. My question was how it was that the SDTC board had a conflict of interest policy in place that didn't comply with the act.

Here's what this unlawful, so-called conflict of interest policy allowed board members to do. This is right from paragraph 6.46 of the Auditor General's report. Board members were allowed, under the policy, to buy or sell securities in companies that were funding recipients of SDTC as soon as three days after a public announcement of a funding decision.

How was that allowed to stand?

5:30 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

Those were the procedures at the time, and I took over as chair—

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Ms. Verschuren, here is the situation we have. The SDTC board could approve funding for a company on Monday and then, on Thursday, board members could buy or sell shares in that very same company. Do you know what that is? It's insider trading, isn't it?

5:30 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

Those processes were in place when I arrived as chair, so this was the recommendation made by—

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

They remained in place. For five years you were the chair, and for five years they remained in place. You did nothing about it. Leah Lawrence, the CEO at the time, went to you and said that the conflict of interest guidelines or policy as it pertained to the board needed to be strengthened.

You kiboshed efforts to strengthen those conflict of interest policies, to bring them in line with the act and to end the insider trading. Isn't that right?

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

I followed what I believed and...recommended by independent legal advice—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Is that the independent legal advice of the conflicted Ed Vandenberg? Is that the legal advice that you received? Is that your excuse?

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

—and from the management team. That was the way in which these—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

It's very interesting because at SDTC there was a conflict of interest policy for staff. Staff, quite appropriately, were prohibited from investing in a company funded by SDTC for five years following a project's completion—five years—yet board members could invest in companies three days after a public announcement of a funding decision was made. How do you explain that?

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

The procedures were those that I followed, and—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Those were ones that facilitated insider trading. Do you know what the explanation is? It's that the board you chaired was corrupt from top to bottom.

By the way, Ms. Verschuren, you've sat as a director on publicly traded companies. Haven't you?

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

You know full well that, pursuant to the rules on insider trading and self-dealing from the Ontario Securities Commission, directors can't, within days of a public announcement, purchase shares in the company for which they sit as a director. You know you can't do that. Is that not right?

Annette Verschuren

I believe I followed the procedures—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

You know that's not the case. You can't do that.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

Mr. Cooper, your time is up. I'll allow the witness to answer.

Ms. Verschuren, you have the floor.

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

Certainly, the procedures were established when I got there and continued. I think this is—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

[Technical difficulty—Editor] because it was one big, green gravy train.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

I'm going to move on now.

Ms. Yip, you have the floor for five minutes, please.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Ms. Verschuren, for coming today. Would you like to finish answering the question?

5:35 p.m.

As an Individual

Annette Verschuren

No, it's not necessary. I think I have tried to establish—

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

She's admitted her guilt—

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Okay. Thank you. It's my time.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative John Williamson

Mr. Cooper, your time is up.

Ms. Yip, you have the floor.

Jean Yip Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Thank you.

Do you recognize that your lack of recusals has impacted the industry, leaving small businesses and innovators in a vulnerable position? Do you have any comment?