MP Brock and any other MP at this committee are not witnesses. We are members, who are duly sworn to represent our particular ridings. We are on this committee to ask witnesses questions.
His analogy would be akin to me going back to my old life and having a judge interrupt me in the middle of an examination-in-chief or a cross-examination to say, “Mr. Brock, you need to be sworn in to tell the truth in the form of how you're going to pose the question.”
That is a ridiculous assessment by Monsieur Drouin. Either we have unanimous consent or not. Clearly, by his intervention, I think we don't have unanimous consent, but I'd like to hear that from him.