Ms. Verschuren, with the greatest respect, that was not my question. My question was how it was that the SDTC board had a conflict of interest policy in place that didn't comply with the act.
Here's what this unlawful, so-called conflict of interest policy allowed board members to do. This is right from paragraph 6.46 of the Auditor General's report. Board members were allowed, under the policy, to buy or sell securities in companies that were funding recipients of SDTC as soon as three days after a public announcement of a funding decision.
How was that allowed to stand?