If I understand you correctly, you were following a sort of general procedure that the board used, but that procedure, for whatever reason, seems to have run afoul of the Conflict of Interest Act, according to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, because, as you mentioned, you did point out that you failed to comply with that act on some occasions, especially around non-recusal. There were, as I say, four decisions where you were making a decision on funding companies that were involved with the Verschuren Centre and MaRS, and you even voted on those.
Was there a difference in those situations? Do you recall why you would have voted on those, but, for the most part, you did not vote on the others?