I guess the question that comes out of this in my mind is this: Is it just inherently problematic in the structure of that whole ecosystem to then have people within that ecosystem assessing grant applications? Because they're all connected to everybody else, there are going to be conflicts of interest all over the place. I'm just wondering—maybe this wasn't in your mandate—why this was decided to be the structure of assessing these applications when....
Let me phrase it differently. Is the sustainable tech ecosystem or the start-up ecosystem smaller than other ecosystems, I'll just say, in the business world? Is this the kind of a place that would just generate conflicts of interest automatically? I'm just wondering why this was set up in this way in the first place.