It varied. I would say there's no doubt that virtually all of the substantive discussion on the pros and cons of a project and the real substantive work around due diligence was done at the project review committee. It was the project review committee that brought projects to the board.
Generally speaking, projects were reviewed in some measure of detail for the board. There was a presentation by a vice-president of SDTC, who would walk folks through the content of the project, what was ultimately involved and what was hoped to be achieved by funding it. It was not unusual at all to have a number of questions from board members as part of that process.
I do not recall at any time a board member calling fundamental concerns about a project that had been recommended by the PRC, but sometimes the discussions on projects could actually be quite lengthy. It could be up to maybe 20 minutes or a half hour.