Certainly.
Very quickly, the process was that the project review committee presented information to the board. That was the basis of the board's discussion. There was usually a small package on each individual project. A vice-president of the organization reviewed the project with the board. Board members asked questions. In some cases, there was a very fulsome conversation when there were questions. In some cases, I recall, there were very limited conversations around projects.
It was not unusual to have an animated discussion on specific projects, but I never saw any fundamental disagreements. It was more around challenging the evidence that was brought forward by the PRC.