Okay.
Again, just to get an idea for myself about how involved these discussions were around the board table about whether to fund a project or not, I've sat on boards that sound similar, where staff would prepare a report on different projects. In my case, these were big projects worth millions of dollars, but then they were brought to the board, and we would have long discussions on each one to make sure that the money was being well spent even though the staff was recommending this over that, etc.
How did those conversations take place in SDTC? Were they kind of rubber-stamping what the staff came up with? You said there was the project review committee. I don't know who sat on that, but for the parts you saw at that stage, were there long, involved discussions on the pros and cons of each project?