Then you're familiar with the clause on page 9 of the act on directors not profiting. It says:
Except as provided under subsection (1), no director shall profit or gain any income or acquire any property from the Foundation or its activities.
Yet, we know that the Auditor General has found that nine directors, for a total of 82% of the transactions, were conflicted when money was voted to companies they had, representing $330 million in that loan. Then, of course, there's the $59 million that the Auditor General found that they voted for companies, some of which were their own, totally outside of the contribution agreements you referenced.
I would like to know this: Since you read the act, and since you saw them voting for each other's companies, did you ever raise that with the deputy minister?