I think we all agree, and we agreed at the subcommittee, that this is something we should be studying. As the subcommittee report says here, we were supposed to be looking at other things and trying to wrap things up in December with the ArriveCAN and SDTC studies before we go rushing off to the next shiny thing. I'm hoping we will do that.
I'd like to see in this motion some more of that structure reflected in terms of timing. We wouldn't have the next meeting on CEBA until the end of January, for instance, when we've finished all of this other stuff. Maybe we should add in our agreement to look at seniors, etc., and how that would work. I'm just a bit concerned that if we vote for this as it stands, we'll be off on yet another tangent and leave all of this other stuff hanging.
As I keep saying, I'm new to this committee. It works in wonderful and mysterious ways. I would rather have something in this motion that says not just that we should do a study on CEBA, but that this is how it's going to fit in with the rest of our work. That's all.