I do, Mr. Chair.
To go into Mr. Desjarlais's point about this debate, the items he's raising about the relevance or not are not ruling that the motion is in order. Whether or not he believes or we believe that this needs to be studied, debate should be had on the merits of that.
On ruling it in or out, from a technical perspective, I believe it's allowed. I would say that the debate on this could be a part of the main debate, not a challenge over the validity of it.