That's interesting. You can see the perspective of the workers in your office, given that unique decision, in the sense that you approached Treasury Board for a decision relative to a decision you may have had the power to make.
For Canadians' sake, we have to know exactly who the decision-makers are in advance of collective bargaining. In this case it's important that workers know exactly who is making the decisions in relation to their wages. That's a fairness principle in Canada.
Given the fact that you just testified that you approached Treasury Board on this, would you say that there was interference from Treasury Board in the decision related to arbitration?