I guess the biggest difference between other countries and ours is commitments being followed up by action. That would be the biggest difference in terms of what we're seeing elsewhere. Canada has had no shortage of commitments, but unfortunately has had a disappointing set of actions in terms of the climate change record.
I'd like to bring this back to the non-partisan nature of this committee and the depolarization point that we make in our report. You're absolutely right: We do need to work together. The interests being expressed by the various members today are not unimportant. We do need to figure out how this transition will work so that people aren't left behind in some sort of Darwinian transition, where communities or regions are left holding the bag while others transition to a net-zero future.
We have to be in this together and recognize that in terms of all of our interests—a healthy environment and quality of life for our future generations—everybody in this meeting, I believe, shares those interests. It's just a question about how to do it. That's why we focus on depolarizing the debate about whether we should do something and focus on what are the best tools to accomplish the government's commitments to a net-zero future and significant reductions by 2030.