Thank you, sir. I don't mean to interrupt, but my time is short.
In the absence of a great new technological development, we have three primary sources. One is renewables, which everyone here, I'm sure, would like to see more of, which include solar and wind. Unfortunately, they're intermittent technology. Then we have fossil fuels and then we have nuclear.
Right now—correct me if I'm wrong—if we want to reduce fossil fuel-generated energy, we need at least the same amount if not more nuclear, because, as I said, renewables are intermittent technologies, and we currently don't have the batteries to store their intermittent power. So we need nuclear and we need more nuclear.