I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude and cut you off, but I'm given me a limited amount of time.
Thank you for that.
That all goes around this lack of a risk-based approach to this, and all the way through to the proposal-based approach. It's such a flawed model of how we do this.
It seems to me—and this is more of a statement than a question—that the people who are accessing the funding to solve their issues, from a mitigation perspective, are the people who best play the bureaucratic game and find their way through this proposal-based system. If we're not out doing the actual risk-based assessment to find the areas we need to invest in, to be proactive and preventative, we're going to keep coming back to this spot.
I'm going to move on, because I know I'm limited in time.
Last week in the House of Commons, the minister, in responding to your report, and in an answer to a question from my colleague, said:
In fact, the Auditor General's report noted that, while Indigenous Services Canada is doing a great job helping emergency management of those crises, we need to invest more in protection and in adaptation.
I have two quick questions on that.
One, I've scoured the report. I didn't find anywhere in there where you state that Indigenous Services Canada is doing a great job. I did some word searches, and I did some digging. Is there somewhere another report, an appendix or something, that these people get that we don't get? Do you agree they're doing a great job here somewhere that I missed?