Well, I would say that the evacuation is not to a fully developed community. The community of Kashechewan has infrastructure, schools, housing and those types of things. The evacuation to higher land is to a camp that we bring in. We funded tents—not tents in the sense of a camping tent, but hard-walled tents—and infrastructure that is temporary and usable for spring.
It is not a permanent encampment piece that we have developed up there. It's not another community that they've gone to in order to evacuate, as they would to a community like Thunder Bay, for example. It is a temporary place for them to evacuate to for a specified amount of time. It's not a new community.
If they were to relocate permanently, that's part of the planning that would have to take place around the broader infrastructure: water treatment plants, schools, health services and all those types of things that don't exist permanently on the land that is used for the back-to-the-land evacuation.
Thanks.