Okay. Well, thank you very much.
I think we've proven pretty clearly in this report that the assumptions built in here don't seem realistic at all, but there is a cost here. There is a short-term and a long-term CO2 cost, and there is an indication why we aren't getting lower-carbon production in Canada: We aren't counting the full cycle of this.
Offshoring carbon production doesn't work either. If we get wind towers built in Germany and don't count that as part of our carbon footprint if we're going to use them in Canada for producing hydrogen, then we are missing half the equation.
I'm going to go back to the modelling here from both your departments. Was this modelling driven from on high in order to come up with a result to meet a government narrative, as opposed to a realistic scenario?