What we've also had emphasized here today is that, unlike with the CERB, while attestation may have played a minimal role in the wage subsidy, this was not an attestation-based model. The policy design here was quite different, with verification built in from the beginning.
My question relates to the whole approach when it comes to verification, where things are going as far as the assessment of risk is concerned and how you take that into account.
I'm running out of time, but could you also take a moment to clarify a few things? It's a different topic, but with the dental benefit, for example, or the housing benefit, yes, there's an attestation-based approach, but there are verification processes built in to check. There are a number of things that people are asked beforehand. There's postverification that can take place. Could you touch on that as well?
There are two questions built into one.